Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.
Research has consistently demonstrated the prevalence of correspondence bias. A classic study by Jones and Harris (1967) involved participants reading essays that either supported or opposed a stance by the writer. Even when participants were informed that essayists had been assigned their positions, they still inferred that the writers genuinely held those views. This suggests a strong tendency to make dispositional attributions despite clear situational constraints.
Further research highlights the asymmetry in attribution between self and others. Individuals are more likely to attribute their behaviors to external circumstances, whereas they attribute others’ behaviors to stable personality traits. This pattern reinforces the robustness of correspondence bias and its influence on social perception.
Cultural background significantly affects attribution patterns. Miller (1984) found that participants from Western countries who belong to an individualistic society were more prone to dispositional attributions than Asian participants, who come from collectivist cultures and emphasize contextual explanations for behavior. Similarly, research by Li et al. (2012) indicates that religious beliefs can shape attribution tendencies. Protestants, who traditionally emphasize the soul’s role in guiding actions, exhibited stronger internal attributions compared to Catholics, who were more likely to consider external circumstances.
Two primary psychological mechanisms contribute to correspondence bias. The perceptual salience hypothesis posits that observers focus more on individuals' actions than on the surrounding context, leading to an overemphasis on personality traits. Another explanation, correction theory, suggests that while people initially attribute behavior to personality, they may attempt to adjust for situational factors; however, these corrections often remain insufficient, reinforcing the original dispositional judgment.
Correspondence bias, also known as the fundamental attribution error, is the tendency to attribute others' behaviors to their personality rather than situational factors.
An experiment to confirm this bias found that participants assumed essays reflected the writers' true beliefs, even when they knew the writers had no choice in their stance.
Another study found that while people explain their actions based on external circumstances, they judge others based on personality traits, reinforcing the correspondence bias.
Cultural norms also affect attribution. Fundamental attribution errors are more common in individualistic Western societies than in collectivist Asian cultures.
Psychological explanations indicate that individuals focus on a person’s actions rather than the surrounding context, leading to biased judgments.
Another explanation suggests a two-step process in which individuals first make a quick, automatic internal attribution about others' actions, followed by a weaker and more effortful adjustment for external circumstances.
繁體中文
