Both alkyne (C≡C) and nitrile (C≡N) functional groups contain triple bonds and show stretching absorptions around the wavenumber range of 2100 to 2300 cm−1 in the diagnostic region of the IR spectra.
Comparing the stretching vibrational frequency of C≡C triple bonds with that of double and single bonds, it is evident that C≡C triple bonds exhibit a higher stretching frequency than C=C double and C–C single bonds. Similarly, the C≡N triple bond exhibits higher stretching absorption than the C=N and C–N bonds. The higher stretching is because the carbon atoms involved in triple bonds are sp hybridized in alkyne and nitrile. Therefore, they form shorter and stronger bonds with higher stretching absorptions.
C≡N bonds connected to a double bond or an aromatic ring absorb at a lower frequency due to their π electrons being conjugated.
Due to the difference in the dipole moment, the C≡C triple bond in the terminal alkynes vibrates at a higher stretching absorption frequency than unsymmetrical internal alkynes. In the terminal alkynes, the stretching of the triple bond causes a significant change in dipole moment, resulting in a large vibrational frequency. In contrast, in internal alkynes, the change in bond dipole moment due to C≡C bond stretching is negligible. The terminal alkynes have ≡C–H stretching absorptions at 3300 cm−1.
Triple bonds are stronger than double bonds and single bonds. An alkyne's triple bond vibrates at a higher stretching frequency than an alkene's double bond and an alkane's single bond.
For similar reasons, the C≡N of nitriles exhibit higher stretching frequencies than the C=N and the C–N.
A C≡N connected to a double bond or an aromatic ring absorbs at a lower frequency due to their π electrons being in conjugation.
The C≡C and the C≡N stretching frequencies appear in the diagnostic region of the IR spectrum.
In addition to the C≡C, terminal alkynes show a sharp C–H stretching vibration peak at about 3300 cm−1.
The C≡C stretch of terminal alkynes is more intense than the corresponding stretch in internal alkynes. This is because stretching the triple bond in terminal alkynes causes a large change in dipole moment, whereas in internal alkynes, the change is negligible.
Symmetrical internal alkynes do not show C≡C stretching absorptions due to no change in the dipole moment.