I’ve been watching my team use Claude Code for a few months now, and there’s this weird pattern. Two developers with similar experience working on similar tasks, but one consistently ships features in hours while the other is still debugging. At first I thought it was just luck or skill differences. Then I realized what was actually happening, it’s their instruction library. I’ve been lurking in Discord servers and GitHub repos, and there’s this underground collection of power users sharing CLAUDE.md templates and slash commands, we saw many in this subreddit already. They’re hoarding workflows like trading cards: - Commands that automatically debug and fix entire codebases - CLAUDE.md files that turn Claude into domain experts for specific frameworks - Prompt templates that trigger hidden thinking modes
我一直在看着我的团队使用Claude代码了几个月，而且有这种怪异的模式。有两个具有类似经验的开发人员从事类似的任务，但是一个小时内始终如一的船只功能，而另一个仍在调试中。起初，我认为这只是运气或技能差异。然后我意识到实际发生了什么，这是他们的指导库。我一直潜伏在Discord服务器和GitHub存储库中，并且有共享Claude.md模板和Slash命令的Power用户的地下集合，我们已经在此SubredDit中看到了许多。他们正在ho积工作流，例如交易卡： - 自动调试并修复整个代码库的命令 - claude.md文件，将克劳德变成特定框架的域专家 - 迅速的模板，这些模板触发隐藏思维模式
Meanwhile, most people are still typing “help me fix this bug” and wondering why their results suck. One person mentioned their C++ colleague solved a 4-year-old bug in minutes using a custom debugging workflow. Another has slash commands that turn 45-minute manual processes into 2-minute automated ones. The people building these instruction libraries aren’t necessarily better programmers - they just understand that Claude Code inherits your bash environment and can leverage complex tools through MCP. It’s like having cheat codes while everyone else plays on hard mode. As one developer put it: “90% of traditional programming skills are becoming commoditized while the remaining 10% becomes worth 1000x more.” That 10% isn’t coding, it’s knowing how to design distributed system, how to architect AI workflows. The people building powerful instruction sets today are creating an unfair advantage that compounds over time. Every custom command they write, every CLAUDE.md pattern they discover, widens the productivity gap. Are we seeing the emergence of a new class of developer? The ones who can orchestrate AI vs those who just prompt it?
同时，大多数人仍在输入“帮助我修复此错误”，并想知道为什么他们的结果很烂。一个人提到他们的C ++同事使用自定义调试工作流程在几分钟内解决了一个4岁的错误。另一个具有将45分钟的手动过程转换为2分钟自动化的斜线命令。建立这些指令库的人不一定是更好的程序员 - 他们只是了解Claude代码继承您的狂欢环境，并可以通过MCP利用复杂的工具。这就像有作弊代码时，其他所有人都在硬模式下播放。正如一位开发人员所说：“ 90％的传统编程技能正在商品化，而剩余的10％的价值则增加了1000倍。”该10％的编码不是，它知道如何设计分布式系统，如何架构AI工作流程。当今人们建立强大的指导集的人们正在创造不公平的优势，随着时间的流逝而变得更加复杂。他们编写的每个自定义命令，每个发现的每个claude.md模式都会扩大生产力差距。我们是否看到新的开发人员的出现？那些可以协调AI与那些促使它的人的人？
Are you generous enough to share your secret sauce?
您足够慷慨地分享秘密酱汁吗？
Edit: sorry if I didn’t make myself clear, I was not asking you to share your instructions, my post is more about philosophical questions about the future, when CC become general available and the only edges will be the secret/powerful instructions.
编辑：抱歉，如果我不清楚自己，我不是要求您分享您的指示，我的帖子更多地是关于未来的哲学问题，何时CC成为一般性，唯一的边缘将是秘密/强大的说明。
