LinkedIn Hates Me Published on July 3, 2025 by Hakkı Rıza Küçük. Last updated July 3, 2025 . Tags: linkedin Estimated word count: 841 Estimated A4 page count: 2 Estimated reading time (200 wpm): 5 min ⏳
LinkedIn讨厌我于2025年7月3日由HakkıRızaKüçük出版。最后更新于2025年7月3日。标签：LinkedIn估计单词计数：841估计的A4页数：2估计的阅读时间（200 wpm）：5分钟⏳
Discuss & Support You can discuss this article on HackerNews . You can also support my blogging efforts. Check out the Footer.
讨论和支持您可以在Hackernews上讨论本文。您还可以支持我的博客工作。查看页脚。
Throughout 2024 LinkedIn has intermittently restricted my account and provided to clear explanation. Each time I was able unlock my account after going through a security check, identity verification and a period of waiting, usually up to 2 weeks. This happened to me one last time around the beginning of 2025. At that point I have really given up using LinkedIn altogether due to this inconvenience. I even used to have a link to my LinkedIn on my blog, which I removed because it was pointing to a dead page essentially. These days I am trying to get more serious in my blogging, video and digital goods creation journey. Quite a few people and non-people (LLMs) have suggested audiance growth through LinkedIn. I told them what I will be telling you in this blog post: LinkedIn hates me and I am unable solve this or even understand why. Perhaps not being on LinkedIn is a blessing considering that the platform has become more like Facebook with a touch of business-talk. Also the last thing I remember about being on LinkedIn was bot accounts making me irresistible offers about AWS cost cutting servies. It was funny because they did not ask for money, they only asked for AWS credentials. Anyhow. I believe anyone who wishes to reach an audiance as large as possible cannot be choosers. So I am begging you LinkedIn: What have I done to piss you off so much?
在2024年，LinkedIn间歇性地限制了我的帐户，并提供了清晰的解释。每次我能够在进行安全检查，身份验证和等待期间（通常长达2周）后，我能够解锁我的帐户。这发生在2025年初左右的最后一次。那时，由于这种不便，我真的放弃了利用LinkedIn。我什至在博客上曾在LinkedIn上有一个链接，我将其删除了，因为它指向了一个死页。如今，我试图在博客，视频和数字商品创建旅程中变得更加认真。相当多的人和非人（LLMS）建议通过LinkedIn的录音增长。我告诉他们我将在这篇博客文章中告诉您的内容：LinkedIn讨厌我，我无法解决甚至理解原因。考虑到该平台已经变得更像Facebook，也许不在LinkedIn上，这是一种祝福。我还记得在LinkedIn上的最后一件事是机器人帐户，这使我对AWS成本削减服务的报价不可抗拒。这很有趣，因为他们没有索要钱，他们只要求AWS证书。无论如何。我相信任何希望达到尽可能大的听觉的人都不能成为选择者。所以我恳求您LinkedIn：我做了什么使您如此生气？
What Happened So Far So after many months of LinkedIn closing my account, I was finally convinced to attempt to unlock my account yet again. Fig. 1: Linkedin says 'verification already sent'. This time it was different. I've sent a security verification, I think even received a confirmation e-mail that it was submitted. However I waited quite a long time and received no answer. I could not send another verification either, because it was showing me that it was already sent (Fig. 1). So I have decided to submit an appeal. If you've gone through this process before, you might be familiar with the fact that it is really, really difficult to find LinkedIn's appeal contact form. A lot of"contact LinkedIn" links point you to pages where you have to be a logged in user. So LinkedIn is basically like,"aww, is your account restricted? Well just log in and reach out to us. Oh you can't login? Ahaha too bad, sucks to be you." For all those lost time, for what it is worth, I will proudly paste the link to LinkedIn appeal form here (as of July 2025): Contact LinkedIn support . So basically I've sent that form. And lo and behold, I did receive an answer (Fig. 2): Fig. 2: Linkedin update on my appeal. 'After reviewing your account again, we found it doesn't comply with our Professional Community Policies or LinkedIn User Agreement. As a result, access to your account will remain restricted. ' This is really weird that my account does not comply with their rules. What could I have possibly done? I am as curious as you are. I am aware that these faceless companies are really all so automated, that I should be happy even to have received this answer. But I think I deserve a more clear answer. Fig. 3: LinkedIn says 'We're sorry. There was an error creating your case Please try again.' So I reach them out again. I fill out the form and try to send it. And surprise surprise (Fig. 3): We're sorry. There was an error creating your case Please try again. Same result in other browsers. I guess I will just go fuck myself. Or I can create another account under a different e-mail, only for that to be abused by LinkedIn for mysterious reasons too. I bet if I make another account, this time they will say: you already seem to have an account under this verified ID. Since you attempt to create a duplicate account, we will send a drone to your house and restrict, erm, you.
到目前为止，发生了几个月的LinkedIn关闭我的帐户后，我终于说服了再次尝试解锁我的帐户。图1：LinkedIn说“验证已经发送”。这次是不同的。我已经发送了安全验证，我认为甚至收到了一封已提交的确认电子邮件。但是我等了很长时间，没有得到答案。我也无法发送另一个验证，因为它向我展示了它已经发送（图1）。因此，我决定提出上诉。如果您以前经历了此过程，那么您可能会熟悉这样的事实，即找到LinkedIn的上诉联系人表格确实非常困难。许多“联系LinkedIn”链接将您指向必须登录用户的页面。因此，LinkedIn基本上喜欢“噢，您的帐户受到限制？对于所有浪费的时间，就价值的时间，我会自豪地将链接粘贴到这里的LinkedIn上诉表（截至2025年7月）：联系LinkedIn支持。因此，基本上我已经发送了该表格。瞧瞧，我确实收到了一个答案（图2）：图2：LinkedIn关于我的上诉的更新。``在再次查看您的帐户后，我们发现它不符合我们的专业社区政策或LinkedIn用户协议。结果，访问您的帐户将保持限制。``这真的很奇怪，我的帐户不符合其规则。我可以做什么？我和你一样好奇。我知道这些不露面的公司确实是如此自动化，甚至应该收到这个答案，我也应该很高兴。但是我认为我应该得到一个更清晰的答案。图3：LinkedIn说：“我们很抱歉。有一个错误创建您的案件，请重试。”所以我再次伸出手。我填写表格并尝试发送。惊喜（图3）：我们很抱歉。有一个错误创建您的案件，请重试。其他浏览器的结果相同。我想我会去他妈的自己。或者，我可以在另一封电子邮件下创建另一个帐户，只是出于神秘原因也被LinkedIn滥用。我敢打赌，如果我创建另一个帐户，这次他们会说：您似乎已经在此经过验证的ID下有一个帐户。由于您尝试创建一个重复的帐户，因此我们将把无人机发送到您的房屋并限制您。
