L AWYERS are a conservative bunch, befitting a profession that rewards preparedness, sagacity and respect for precedent. No doubt many enjoyed a chuckle at the tale of Steven Schwartz, a personal-injury lawyer at the New York firm Levidow, Levidow & Oberman, who last month used Chat GPT to help him prepare a court filing. He relied a bit too heavily on the artificial-intelligence ( AI ) chatbot. It created a motion replete with made-up cases, rulings and quotes, which Mr Schwartz promptly filed after the bot assured him that the “cases I provided are real and can be found in reputable legal databases” (they were not, and cannot). Lesson learned, a tech-sceptic lawyer might conclude: the old ways are the best.
lawyers是一群保守的，适合一个奖励准备，稳定和尊重先例的职业。毫无疑问，许多人在纽约Levidow，Levidow＆Oberman的个人伤害律师史蒂芬·施瓦茨（Steven Schwartz）的故事中笑了，他上个月使用Chat GPT帮助他准备法院提交法院。他过于依赖人工智能（AI）聊天机器人。它创造了一个动议，上面有虚构的案件，裁定和行情，施瓦茨先生在机器人保证“我提供的案件是真实的，可以在信誉良好的法律数据库中找到”（它们不是，不能，也不能）。从中学到的经验教训，一位技术感官律师可能会得出结论：旧方法是最好的。
