When a force is applied to a linear spring, the restoring force increases proportionally with the amount of displacement. This behavior is described by Hooke’s law, which allows the work done on the spring to be determined directly from the force–displacement relationship. In this case, the force varies in a simple and predictable manner, making the calculation relatively simple.
On the other hand, a nonlinear spring does not obey Hooke’s law. Its restoring force depends on position in a non-proportional way, causing the force–displacement relationship to become curved rather than linear. One example of such a restoring force is given by the expression
where the force increases more rapidly than the displacement alone. This form shows how nonlinear effects become more pronounced as the spring is stretched further.
The total work done in stretching a nonlinear spring is determined by accumulating the force over the displacement. However, evaluating this quantity directly is difficult because the square root term complicates standard integration techniques. To simplify the calculation, the substitution rule is applied. This method introduces a new variable to represent the expression inside the square root, making the remaining terms easier to handle.
By differentiating the substituted variable and rearranging terms, the expression can be rewritten in a simpler form that reduces to a single power. After carrying out the integration, the substituted variable is replaced with the original displacement variable so that the physical meaning of the result is preserved. The final expression represents the work required to stretch the nonlinear spring.
When a force is applied to a linear spring, the restoring force increases evenly with displacement. This relationship follows Hooke’s law, which enables the calculation of work done from the force–displacement curve.
For a nonlinear spring, Hooke’s law does not apply. Its restoring force changes with position, so the force–displacement graph becomes curved.
The total work done in stretching the spring is determined by integrating this force over displacement.
However, the integral is difficult to solve directly because a square root term complicates the standard integration process.
To simplify the integral, the substitution rule is used. It introduces a new variable for the complex term. Differentiating the variable and rearranging the derivative helps us substitute the other terms inside the integral.
Applying the substitution transforms the term inside the square root into a simpler expression, converting the integral into a single power function.
After integration, the new variable is replaced with the original displacement variable, preserving its physical interpretation.
The final expression represents the work required to stretch a nonlinear spring.
繁體中文
